Contrary to the popular belief that the renegotiation of the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) under the Trump administration would be disastrous for Canada, there is a dynamic at play that many overlook. The perspective that “Donald Trump won’t kill CUSMA” is not an unfounded one, as the U.S. also has significant stakes in the potential fallout of the trade talks.

What The U.S. Stands to Lose

The U.S. and Canada share one of the largest trading relationships in the world. Not only does Canada act as the largest export market for the U.S., but it is also a significant supplier of energy, raw materials, and parts that fuel the American economy. The disruption of this highly integrated supply chain through a trade war could have severe repercussions for the U.S. economy.

Unforeseen Consequences for American Jobs

Trade between the U.S. and Canada supports millions of American jobs across various sectors. According to a report by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, disruption in this trade relationship could risk 14 million American jobs that are tied to trade with Canada and Mexico. The loss of these jobs would be a significant blow to the U.S. economy.

Impact on the Automotive Industry

The automotive industry, a cornerstone of the American manufacturing sector, relies heavily on a seamless North American supply chain. Any disruption due to changes in CUSMA could lead to increased costs for manufacturers and consumers alike, potentially causing a slowdown in this critical industry.

The Agricultural Sector at Stake

U.S. farmers have always enjoyed a robust trade relationship with Canada. However, if CUSMA is destabilized, the American agricultural sector could face significant barriers to exporting their products to Canada, which would be a massive blow to the industry.

The Question of National Security

The U.S.’ national security could also be at risk. Canada is a close ally and a critical partner in North American defence. A strained relationship could potentially weaken the U.S.’ security position, both domestically and internationally.

Conclusion: A Mutually Beneficial Relationship

As David Olive writes, it’s crucial to remember that both nations stand to lose if trade relations sour. The renegotiation of CUSMA should be approached with the understanding of mutual benefit, preserving the trade relationship that has proved fruitful for both countries over the years.

Ethan Radcliffe

Ethan Radcliffe is a senior reporter and digital editor at The Toronto Insider, specializing in Canadian federal policy, GTA urban development, and national economic trends. With over a decade of experience in North American journalism, Ethan focuses on translating complex legislative and economic developments into clear, accessible reporting for Canadian readers. Ethan’s work emphasizes policy analysis, government accountability, and data-driven reporting, with a strong focus on how federal and provincial decisions impact communities across the Greater Toronto Area and beyond. He has covered infrastructure planning, housing policy, fiscal strategy, and regulatory changes affecting Canadian households and businesses. A graduate of Toronto Metropolitan University’s School of Journalism, Ethan brings expertise in investigative reporting, long-form analysis, editorial standards, and digital publishing best practices. His reporting is guided by verifiable sources, public records, and transparent sourcing. In addition to reporting, Ethan has experience in newsroom editing, fact-checking workflows, SEO-informed journalism, and audience analytics, ensuring stories meet both editorial integrity standards and modern digital discoverability requirements. Ethan is committed to objective, fact-driven journalism and adheres to established ethical guidelines, prioritizing accuracy, clarity, and public trust in all reporting.

See Full Bio